Abdul Mahmud, a lawyer, social critic and human rights
advocate, has faulted the decision of the Supreme Court to sack Emeka Ihedioha
of the Peoples Democratic Party as governor of Imo State.
The apex court had sacked Ihedioha and pronounce Hope
Uzodinma of the All Progressives Congress as the rightful winner of the
election.
The court also ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission
to issue Uzodinma a Certificate of Return.
Reacting to the ruling, Mahmud posited that the court should
had ordered another election due to circumstances surrounding the exercise.
He said, “Considering that the evidence on the record was
before the Supreme Court, the best outcome would have been cancellation of the
Imo poll as requested by APGA for rigging.”
In a tweet, the lawyer also blamed INEC for not judiciously
defending the cancellation of votes in 388 polling units in the March 2019 election.
He wrote, “On the basis of the lawful votes, Ihedioha was
declared winner. When battle raged at the tribunal last July, APC cleverly
argued that its votes lawfully declared in polling units were unlawfully
excluded at the collation center. It called 54 witnesses, including INEC
officials.
“PDP only called one witness to rebut the testimonies of APC
witnesses. INEC didn't call a single witness, tender a single document on the
disputed excluded votes, nor called its collation officers as witnesses.
“At the tribunal, INEC played a funny game and PDP didn't
defend its victory with seriousness, knowing that the appellate courts sit on
the records of the tribunal.
“Ostensibly, the Supreme Court simply set aside the decision
of the Court of Appeal and tribunal and accepted the evidence of the APC led at
the tribunal.
“Did the Supreme Court do the right thing? Law is a strange
being, guided by rules of evidence: on the basis of the unchallenged evidence
of the APC, the court acted right. But We should be careful.
“An entire process fudged by security agencies and INEC
created the mess we now see.
“INEC admitted rigged results at the polling units and tried
to exclude them at the collation center didn't show a responsible commission.
“Worse still, INEC neglected to defend an election it
conducted, leaving PDP Ihedioha hung and dry at the tribunal. Finally, the
security agencies made Imo poll what it was: dirty poll.”
0 Comments