Imhoudu, who
stripped naked after his vehicle was impounded by security operatives was on
Thursday, sentenced to six months in prison for picking passengers during the
lockdown of the city.
Rights lawyer, Mr
Tope Akinyode, has said he would approach an Abuja magistrate court asking it
to vacate its judgment against a taxi driver, Emmanuel Imhoudu.
Imhoudu, who
stripped naked after his vehicle was impounded by security operatives was on
Thursday, sentenced to six months in prison for picking passengers during the
lockdown of the city.
Alternatively, he
was asked to pay N10, 000 fine on each of the three counts filed against him
and also make a public apology on any television network.
But Akinyode in a
statement said the fine of and television apology for violating the restriction
order has no place under any known law.
He said, “I have
been briefed by Mr Emmanuel Imhoudu over the ordeal leading to his arrest,
prosecution and eventual conviction at the Magistrates Court in Abuja.
“I was told by Mr
Imhoudu that all through his trial and conviction, he was not represented by
any lawyer.
“As a matter of
fact, he was not even availed a copy of the charge sheet against him to know in
clear terms what his offences are.
“Furthermore, in
convicting Imhoudu, the magistrate ordered him to pay a fine of N30,000 for the
three offences he was convicted of or be sentenced to six months imprisonment.
“Interestingly, he
was also requested to issue a public apology on a television network.
“Imhoudu has already
paid the N30,000 but we will be challenging the judgment at the earliest
possible time because the whole trial is a charade that is bound to be set
aside.
“It is quite
interesting to note that by virtue of Section 5 of the Quarantine Act under
which the presidential regulation which Mr Imhoudu purportedly flouted was
made, the maximum fine or monetary punishment that a defendant is the sum of
N200 or imprisonment for a term of six months. There is also no provision to
issue a television apology after conviction, which if allowed could demoralise
the convicted person and suffer him double jeopardy.
“In essence, the
fine of N10,000 and television apology for violating the restriction order by
the President finds no expression under any known law.
“Against the
foregoing and upon Mr Imhoudu's instruction, we shall approach the magistrate’s
court asking it to vacate its judgment which clearly has no legal basis.”
0 Comments